› About Us › Why Ceraroot › Mechanically Proven

CERAROOT® MECHANICALLY PROVEN

Engineered for Long-Term Reliability

Buy now
Why ceraroot

Proven Mechanical Strength Under ISO 14801

download

Ceramic dental implants offer clear biological and esthetic advantages. However, long-term mechanical reliability remains a critical factor in clinical decision-making.

CeraRoot® ceramic implants have been rigorously evaluated according to the internationally recognized ISO 14801:2016 fatigue testing protocol to verify mechanical endurance under simulated worst-case clinical conditions.

Mechanical fatigue resistance is a primary determinant of long-term implant survival. CeraRoot® implants are engineered to provide structural stability across anterior and posterior indications, supporting predictable long-term clinical outcomes.

All testing was performed in accredited external laboratories under standardized ISO worst-case configurations.

ISO 14801 Test Configuration

Testing was conducted according to ISO 14801 under the following standardized worst-case conditions:

  • 30° loading angle
  • Simulated 3 mm bone loss
  • 11 mm lever arm distance
  • 0.9% NaCl solution at 37°C
  • 2 million loading cycles (≈ 10 years of mastication)
  • Followed by static load-to-failure testing

This configuration represents a worst-case loading scenario as defined by ISO 14801 and is widely recognized as the benchmark for evaluating endosseous dental implant fatigue performance.

Mechanical Performance & Clinical Relevance

Diameter–Endurance Correlation

ISO testing confirms a direct relationship between implant diameter and fatigue resistance. As expected from biomechanical principles, mechanical endurance increases proportionally with diameter. CeraRoot® implants demonstrate fatigue performance within or above the expected mechanical range for contemporary implant systems of comparable dimensions.

Comparative Mechanical Context

ISO 14801 dynamic endurance values reported for zirconia implant systems demonstrate a clear dependence on diameter and design configuration.

As shown in the comparison chart CeraRoot 34 demonstrates higher dynamic strength values compared to commercially available zirconia systems of similar diameter.

Based on published ISO 14801 data, CeraRoot® 34 demonstrates higher reported dynamic strength values compared to Straumann PURE 4.1 mm and Z-Systems 4.0 mm implants tested under comparable ISO configurations.

Manufacturing Quality & Risk Control

CeraRoot® implants are manufactured under strict quality control processes in compliance with ISO 13485.

Mechanical risk scenarios, including worst-case loading conditions, are incorporated into the product risk management file in alignment with ISO 14971 and ISO 14801 testing protocols.

This integrated validation approach ensures that mechanical reliability is not only demonstrated through standardized laboratory testing but is also systematically incorporated into product development, verification, validation, and post-market risk management activities.

Long-Term Clinical Experience

  • Over 15 years of documented clinical use
  • Published clinical data report survival rates of approximately 98% over long-term follow-up periods.
  • Mechanical hazard analysis aligned with ISO 14801 testing
  • Defined worst-case and best-case mechanical scenarios

Conclusion

CeraRoot® ceramic implants combine validated ISO 14801 mechanical endurance testing with long-term clinical experience and structured risk management.

The mechanical performance demonstrated under standardized ISO worst-case conditions, combined with long-term clinical validation and structured risk management, supports the suitability of CeraRoot® implants for routine clinical use in both anterior and posterior regions.

references list

We invite you to visit our eShop to place orders online:  https://store.ceraroot.com/ 

I am a dental professional.

Yes
NO